enola/Enterprise

Architecture controls for engineering teams

Code generation scales. Architectural review does not.

AI-assisted teams can produce more changes than senior engineers can inspect with equal care. Tests still pass while new dependencies cross boundaries, changes spread across repositories, and architecture rules depend on someone noticing.

Enola puts those structural checks into the agent loop and CI. We work with your team to make them accurate against your codebase and measure whether they reduce architectural review load.

Paid, fixed-scope evaluation. Real repositories. Success criteria agreed before we start.

Where the pressure appears

The code is changing faster than the organization can reason about it.

Enola becomes valuable when architectural correctness depends on scarce senior engineering attention.

01

Changes are outpacing review.

Coding agents increase change volume, but senior architectural review does not scale with it. Teams either slow down or accept more structural risk.

02

Important rules depend on memory.

Boundaries, ownership rules, and application-level controls live in documents and review comments. Senior engineers repeat the same guidance, and enforcement varies between reviewers and teams.

03

Local changes have system-wide consequences.

A migration or API change crosses repositories, services, and languages. Engineers spend days tracing consumers and coordinating manually—or discover a missed dependency during delivery.

The first engagement

Prove Enola on your system, against criteria agreed before the work starts.

A paid, fixed-scope evaluation puts Enola into the real engineering workflow and produces a clear rollout decision—not a demo and not an open-ended trial.

Before reviewRegressions found and corrected before a person has to identify them.
Senior attentionRoutine structural questions no longer escalated to Staff and Principal engineers.
Workflow costReview cycle time, adoption, and the cost of running the checks where they matter.
CoverageHow accurately the graph represents the agreed repository and service boundaries.

Ways to engage

Start from the problem you already have.

Architecture and policy as code

Turn important rules into executable controls.

We work with architecture, platform, security, and compliance engineering to identify controls that can be measured from code, express them as Enola constraints, establish evidence and coverage, and introduce enforcement safely.

  • Reporting must not reach cardholder data.
  • Teams may cross a domain only through its public boundary.
  • Regulated code must remain connected to its governance record.
  • Existing debt may remain, but a change must not add to it.
See a worked policy-as-code example

Strategic architecture engagement

Map the system around a consequential change.

We model the relevant repositories and relationships, close the coverage gaps that matter, and give the initiative dependable change-impact evidence before and during the work.

  • Platform and API migrations
  • Monolith decomposition or service consolidation
  • Acquisitions and unfamiliar systems
  • Unsupported frameworks or unusual repository topology
See how Enola links repositories

Ongoing work is scoped only where the problem genuinely recurs—new teams, repositories, policies, languages, acquisitions, or agent workflows.

Why work with us

The software is complete. Making it work across an organization is still engineering work.

Enola cannot infer your internal framework, repository topology, ownership model, rollout policy, or which structural rules matter to the business. Doing that correctly consumes the same senior engineering capacity the organization is trying to protect.

Model the real system.

Establish repository and service boundaries, cross-repository links, and the coverage needed to trust the graph.

Encode what matters.

Turn repeat architecture decisions and application-level controls into measurable declarations.

Introduce the gate safely.

Choose advisory, ratchet, or strict enforcement without making existing debt everyone’s problem.

Close relevant gaps.

Scope internal-framework, extractor, or linking work as part of the implementation rather than leaving a private patch behind.

Fit the workflow.

Put the same evidence in front of coding agents, developers, reviewers, and CI at the point each can act.

Show whether it worked.

Measure the outcome that justified the engagement instead of counting installations or findings.

Open source by design

You do not need an engagement to use Enola.

The complete engine remains Apache 2.0: language extractors, architecture graph, MCP tools, explainers, baselines, constraints, cross-repository analysis, CLI, CI, and dashboard. Run it yourself for as long as you want.

An engagement pays for implementation and an accountable outcome—not permission to keep using the software.

LocalSource, graph, and findings stay inside your infrastructure.
DeterministicParsed source and graph algorithms. No model inference or embeddings.
UnmeteredNo account, licence check, seat count, feature tier, or usage meter.

Engagement fit

A specific engineering problem makes a useful starting point.

A good fit

  • You are rolling coding agents out across real engineering teams.
  • Staff or Principal engineers are becoming review bottlenecks.
  • You have architectural rules that can be stated concretely.
  • A migration or platform change crosses repository boundaries.
  • Someone owns the initiative and can define a successful outcome.

Probably not a fit

  • You want a generic code-quality score.
  • You expect Enola to replace testing, security scanning, or compliance assessment.
  • There is no specific workflow, initiative, boundary, or policy to improve.
  • You only need help installing the binary.

Security and deployment

One binary, inside your infrastructure.

There is no hosted ingestion service or account to operate.

Source stays local.

Enola reads local files and writes snapshots to a local directory you configure.

Evidence stays local.

The graph, findings, constraints, and change verdict remain on the machine that produced them.

No telemetry.

No usage counters, analytics, crash reporting, or background upload.

Simple deployment.

A static binary for Linux, macOS, and Windows. No database or service to operate.

Frequently asked questions

What are we paying for if Enola is open source?

A scoped engineering outcome. We configure Enola against your actual system, model the relevant boundaries, implement the constraints and workflow integration, close agreed coverage gaps, and measure the result. You are not paying to unlock the software.

Is the first evaluation free?

No. It is a paid, fixed-scope engagement because it produces a working implementation and evidence on your codebase. You can evaluate the software itself independently with the open-source build before contacting us.

Does source code leave our infrastructure?

No. Enola runs locally. Source code, snapshots, the architecture graph, constraints, and findings remain inside your infrastructure, with no telemetry or hosted ingestion step.

Will this make all existing architecture debt fail CI?

No. Enola reports the change over a baseline, and enforcement is explicit. A rule can begin as advisory, prevent only new violations through ratcheting, or be strict where the organization requires it.

Does Enola replace tests, security tools, or compliance assessment?

No. Tests verify behaviour, security tools inspect other classes of risk, and reviewers judge intent. Enola measures architecture, change impact, and application-level structural controls that can be represented in its graph.

What happens after the first engagement?

You can operate the implementation yourself. Ongoing work is proposed only when the environment creates recurring needs, such as new teams, repositories, policies, languages, acquisitions, or agent workflows.

Start with the problem

Bring one consequential engineering problem.

Tell us what change, boundary, or rollout you need to make safer; which repositories and teams it affects; and how you would know the engagement worked. We will tell you whether Enola is relevant and, if it is, propose an evaluation scope.

We reply within one working day. If the problem fits Enola, the next step is a short scoping call and a written, fixed-scope proposal.